>>12101307What's not compelling about it?
He shows Lazar lifted his element 115 claims from Scientific American two before before he went public and claimed to have predicted 115. Keep in mind heavy elements such as 115 were already predicted decades earlier.
He shows that the hand scanner Lazar claims was secret was used in a movie and in a university cafeteria decades earlier.
He shows that someone visited the supposed site of S4 and there was nothing there.
He shows Lazar's saucer model is lifted from a known conman decades before him.
He shows that Lazar was best friends with John Lear, a UFO nut, several years before Lazar gave his interview with George Knapp, and shows that they were both running a business together, which George Knapp did a new piece on, several years before his first interview.
Combine that with his complete lack of degrees from MIT and Caltech, the school report showing he finished bottom 3rd of his class, and the contradictions between his first videos and the Joe Rogan interview and you can safely conclude he's a fraud. In the interview with Rogan Lazar claims he didn't know how the craft worked, in his early interview he explains exactly how they worked, using pseudoscience about gravity based propulsion. Now ask yourself why Lazar has never given a conference to scientists. Ask yourself why he only speaks to UFO people.
