>>12086101You can't even define what a frog is. The word frog is meaningless. There are various individuals that might fit under your pre-judicial presumption of the idea of a "frog". But this idea has so many anomalies that it cannot be relied on. The world of ideas is null. On the other hand, Plato was still onto something. Something he knew not of which he spoke. But yet, he touched on it. This is the realm we are now actively discovering as scientists. Not, all. Just some. Just the best ones. The ones doing it as a career will never understand. But the larger point is simply that the world of limits, as we know it, can't be all that there is.
