>>12084209Women leaving the household has been one of the greatest tragedies of our time. Not only has it been a disaster for the normative population's birth rates, but it's also forced children out of the house leaving them to become the prey of whatever drug addled anxiety inducing media is popular at the time. If she wants to talk psychology, then how come we have higher rates of depression and anxiety amongst teens. It's not because we live in stressful times, it's because we precondition our children to have stressful to live in stressful times. One of the chief factors of this being the decline of the motherhood. Children aren't having early sex anymore, we supplement pharmaceuticals for simple dietary fixes, and chalk parenthood up to being a financial decision rather than an adventure. Not only are children unhealthy, but academia is suffering too. Women are very agreeable and vain, they're attracted to academics because they want to maintain status after they lose their beauty and thrive because they can fit into a politically correct block. Why would women need to feel attractive after their prime? Because kids aren't having sex, because they're depressed and isolated, because society preconditions them, because technology sexually "liberated" them, because moms left home, because women want to feel attractive, because most women go to college because they can't find a job doing something technical, because economic constraints, because manufactured dissent culture consumes and regurgitate all issues into the problem of newscasters and profiteering. Don't believe me, watch boyz n the hood (she likes blm) "the best way to destroy a people is you take away their ability to reproduce". Tell her to get married and have kids because she won't in the future (because it's inconvenient or not "liberating enough to not be pumped by dick like a frat girl 247) if she's intelligent, go to school. The mom's perspective needs to seen, she'll go far if she's smart.