>Publish-or-perish: Peer review and the corruption of science
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/sep/05/publish-perish-peer-review-science
>The Effects of Corrupted Peer Reviews on Scientific Credibility
https://www.enago.com/academy/corrupted-peer-review-affects-scientific-credibility/
>Most scientists 'can't replicate studies by their peers'
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778
>In Psychology And Other Social Sciences, Many Studies Fail The Reproducibility Test
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/08/27/642218377/in-psychology-and-other-social-sciences-many-studies-fail-the-reproducibility-te
>Many scientific studies can’t be replicated. That’s a problem.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/08/27/trouble-in-science-massive-effort-to-reproduce-100-experimental-results-succeeds-only-36-times/
Reminder that if you still trust "scientific consensus" you're an idiot. The sciences have become hopelessly corrupt, peer review is just a rubber stamp for people with the right connections. It's especially bad in places like China and India, corruption everywhere.
Scientists are human beings with moral and intellectual failings just like everyone else. They have agendas, both personal and political, like everyone else. You're a fool if you see them as infallible paragons of truth.
Science is not a person or group of people. It's a listen of steps that anyone can follow. That is what determines whether something is scientific or not, not the word of some "pop scientist" like Richard Dawkins, Bertrand Russell, or Bill Nye.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/sep/05/publish-perish-peer-review-science
>The Effects of Corrupted Peer Reviews on Scientific Credibility
https://www.enago.com/academy/corrupted-peer-review-affects-scientific-credibility/
>Most scientists 'can't replicate studies by their peers'
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778
>In Psychology And Other Social Sciences, Many Studies Fail The Reproducibility Test
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/08/27/642218377/in-psychology-and-other-social-sciences-many-studies-fail-the-reproducibility-te
>Many scientific studies can’t be replicated. That’s a problem.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/08/27/trouble-in-science-massive-effort-to-reproduce-100-experimental-results-succeeds-only-36-times/
Reminder that if you still trust "scientific consensus" you're an idiot. The sciences have become hopelessly corrupt, peer review is just a rubber stamp for people with the right connections. It's especially bad in places like China and India, corruption everywhere.
Scientists are human beings with moral and intellectual failings just like everyone else. They have agendas, both personal and political, like everyone else. You're a fool if you see them as infallible paragons of truth.
Science is not a person or group of people. It's a listen of steps that anyone can follow. That is what determines whether something is scientific or not, not the word of some "pop scientist" like Richard Dawkins, Bertrand Russell, or Bill Nye.
