>>12076141>By not taking climate change seriously, we relied on only the most outspoken individuals to be the ones to keep the issue in the public eye.Climatefaggots seem to make the mistake of thinking that people oppose them because they aren't screaming loudly enough.
Everyone knows.
It's been center stage in the public eye for decades.
That isn't why people are opposing you.
People are opposing you because your sloppy politics risks creating even bigger problems.
If you want support,
*keep*
*the*
*policy*
*narrow*
*in*
*scope*
How hard is this to grasp?
People oppose you because your policy is used as a Trojan horse to push political malware.
If you want people to take it seriously, your activism should be directed at people trying to sneak shit though.
The "climate racism" stuff is a prime example of this.
If climatefags aren't pushing back against people trying to piggyback of climate initiatives to push through their own unpopular policy into potentially global laws and agreements, then they only have themselves to blame when people see climate policy as a vehicle for ulterior agendas, because at that point, you have allowed it to become a vehicle for ulterior agendas.
I look at all of these activist groups like XR, and at the PR level, it's all about muh environment, but the small print is all the usual tripe
>Abolish whiteness>Abolish property>Abolish bordersEtc.
If you let these people hijack your position, then you can't complain when others reject it.
