>hypothesis
consciousness is defined as a particle holding information, meaning that the only requirement for consciousness is that two particles become entangled, because once a particle is entangled, it holds definite information about its location, size, temperature, and therefore can be said to be “known” on some definable level. So, in my view, as long as a particle holds information, its “conscious” but I only mean that it fills the bare minimum requirement which allows consciousness to emerge, or in other words that definite information has been preserved through the entanglement

>Implication
The old koan about if a tree makes a sound in a forest where there are no observers, ignoring definitions about what a sound is, it can be said to have been observed regardless of whether humans are around because the information is preserved within the entangled particles.

>conclusion
The universe is a giant consciousness simulation

Now this is the part where you call me a retard and explain why I’m wrong.