>>12071758More like, why would you come back to me if I'm guaranteed to be dead by then?
>>12071683NN's are trivial, and there's nothing to be smug about.
Ignoring all the math, even their structure alone is too simple to resembe an actual brain.
If anyone could be smug here, its probably whoever managed to convince everyone that NN is suitable name.
You only need undergrad math to comprehend the simplest ones, you don't even need the math to know what they actually do, and you can see from most advanced ones that they're objectively retarded.
I remember helping datacel process his input for Tesseract, because it couldn't detect even slightly blurred numbers.
Remember that a human could read a 9 digit number with each digit rotated and/or flipped randomly and it would be a child's play, any 6 year old who learned about numbers can do it.
NN's, compared to humans, are at the level where they can shit themselves and start screaming when hungry.
And they will always be that way.
