>>12067656If your nanomachine is more biological than mechanical, then it is prey to the immune system.
Even metals are bound to be attacked and corroded by specific autoimmune response.
In a world where wet nanobots are that deadly, people would be vaccinated from birth to be immune to it
>if you would use a magnetic force to jam the nanomachines of someone, you would have enough force to kill that guy.Not really. Simply conduct the electricity into the ground like a faraday cage. Electricity would fry the nanobot but avoid any route made of carbon because carbon (depending on structure) is a powerful insultator. This happened in 1859 (Carrington Solar Flares). The sun released massive EMP that destroyed all telegraph lines but killed no one.
And there also other defenses like using specific sound frequencies, x-rays, gamma-rays, and just straight up wearing a hazmat.
Assuming it could even get to the body when jamming already exists