>>12062062Well first I'd read a general philosophy of science book, like Theory and Reality (Peter Godfrey-Smith). For QM specifically, there's a short intro called Quantum Mechanics and Experience (David Albert) and a longer, more mathematical one called The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Hughes). Recently a book called What is Read? by Adam Becker, which is quite enjoyable pop-science so if you're just bored with physics you could just read that. Just look these up and see which one sounds best for you.
Also look up the Einstein-Bohr debates this is a very important topic for anyone interested in physics.
>>12062076The most important point is that science has to rest on a set of non-scientific axioms, such as the principles of the scientific method itself. This is often taken for granted by science students (I was one myself) and it leads to errors. Like I said to the guy above, read a short book on philosophy of science to see why it's important. For physics it is especially important because half of the debates in QM over the 20th century weren't actually about the science.
