>>12074799False. There are experiments that aren't possible yet to determine which interpretation is true. It will take a few decades before we can do these tests but it's not "mental masturbation".
http://adamilab.blogspot.com/2014/06/on-quantum-measurement-part-1-hans.html>>12074399Nothing about physics predicts that you're a boltzmann brain. A brain is an ORDERED clump of matter which makes it far more rare than an UNORDERED clump of matter like a star.
But you're right that many worlds is BS. Quantum Phenomena do not happen to macro things.
>>12074090There's nothing atrocious about non-locality. We already have one example of something like it: the CMBR comes from a region of space that was only 300K ly across, yet form our perspective it looks 100B ly across. That's a mathematical non-locality. Specifically, the aberrations in the CMBR that seem to correlate with each other even though they should have never been causally connected. But we know how they arose, through expansion of spacetime. Something similar could be happening to us even now and generating a similar non-local consequence.
>>12073067No. The wave component of the bohr pilot wave would go through the barrier just fine, but not the particle. But we do see the particle going through the barrier (the interference pattern would differ based on if the particle is affected by the barrier or not), so the pilot wave theory is false.
>>12072944You are actually retarded. KYS.
