>>12059122>reading comprehension is not your strong suit, especially since my initial point still stands.Stronger than yours, considering I was able to understand the meaning of that sentence, and its context, meanwhile you were busy saying that it was, to paraphrase:
>Totally debunked!Yet, even the criticism admits it has some basis, otherwise it would have been worded differently:
>None of the results could be replicated.But they didn't say that.
Also, this post contains no defense, no explanation of WHERE I was incorrect in my reading, just your assertion that I was. So much for your critical thinking, Mr. "Serious Scientist".
By the way, gender studies doesn't count as STEM.
