>>12057557>It's 97 percentoh, is it? how did you come up with that number?
did you consider mechanical and electrical resistances, mechanical attrition, windup cycle of you system?
you surely did a simulation of it right?
only as software or do you have a working prototype?
did you measure the 97%, is it an estimate or a result of some calculation you did?
what are the constraints of your system and what things have you considered in your calculations and which things have you ignored?
so many questions, but you are having a hard time providing any answers
>>12057562>I can't explain itwell thats bad, if you want to sell it
>i need to sell ityou wont be able to, not right now and not in a decade from now
