>>12040897The frightening thing is that you might actually be serious. Even someone with passing grade in physics should not underestimate the scale your are discussing. I'll rather fall for a bait than let you look ignorant about your ignorance.
>I don't see why we can't just suck out all the clouds causing green house effect with giant vacuum tubes into space,>giant vacuum tubesAs said this is not "cloud", we are talking about massive amount of gas present in Venus atmosphere.
Matter or gas, to get a mass away from a source of gravity you need to expand power and expel it beyond escape velocity.
Use your search-fu, someone probably already calculated the mass of the atmosphere you'd need to carry away.
The kind of infrastructure required to pull this off would be better use for anything else.
>while in the meantime the upper atmosphere gets populated with blimps that take care of the temp issuethose blimps would be self-contained habitat no different than spaceship, you might as well wait in orbit or on airless moon, it will be easier and you'll have more ressources
>and travel against rotation to have shorters day night cycle, You'd need to fly really really fast to make this relevant and if you don't have circadian rhythm you might as well not bother and just turn off the light.
Not forgetting that by the time we have the technology to do such project we may have reworked our bodies.
>planet colonization on easy modeIf "colonization" mean surviving inside self-sufficient city while being barely able to use nearby resources then you can easily colonize anything.
