/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12035342

71KiB, 462x461, New0001.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Could science be saved by enforcing anonymous publishing?

Anonymous Sat 22 Aug 09:42:25 2020 No.12035342 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12035358 >>12035389

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Aug 2020 09:46:51 No.12035345 Report

Quoted By:

wh-what’s in the syringe?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Aug 2020 09:52:39 No.12035358 Report

Quoted By:

>>12035342
would lead to too much shitpublishing

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Aug 2020 10:08:57 No.12035389 Report

Quoted By: >>12035439 >>12035532

>>12035342
It would be saved by authors making money on their publications instead of the publisher.
>paying $30 to read an article
>none of that money goes to the writer

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Aug 2020 10:32:06 No.12035439 Report

Quoted By:

>>12035389
the writer actually pays the publisher in most cases.
That’s why I feel 0 remorse for using scihub

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Aug 2020 11:32:45 No.12035532 Report

Quoted By:

>>12035389
What's even worse is that the universities then buy back the products of their own people's research

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches