>>12033811It depends on exactly what context you have in mind but this is why you don't disclose who you are or what you represent in obvious terms so you don't get hassled. To the project's credit, it does take very seriously the idea of not letting some company men just edit articles to be promotional, and this is why there are policies around usernames which actually do make sense. If some username "Coca-Cola" adds a bunch of promotional ad shit to the Coca Cola article, it's blocked, and rightly so. Such a username choice is often a naive tell of some marketing shill who isn't familiar with Wikipedia policy.
People closely related to such-and-such subject can edit as they please. THE TRICK IS TO SIMPLY NOT SAY THAT YOU HAVE THAT PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP, although senior editors are smart and can pick up on that shit anyway if the editor is dumb/overt enough. By "invent" you may also mean: creating a new page, or adding new material, but these don't seem to make sense next to your latter exclusion clause.
We are Wikipedia. Your distinctive edits will be assimilated into our Non-Profit Project for the benefit of all. Resistance is Futile. Please give $3bux (I never would but I've given plenty of the far more valuable commodity: time.)
