>>12033928>this so so retarded that its insane you think its a good point. you dont even attack or address the point and just say these are good definitions because they are the definitions.oy. pic related. you do understand why sexuality evolved right? it's about reproduction. all this skirts and long hair vs pants and short and other bs is just bells and whistles that have nothing to do with it.
>the current definition doesn't even address fetility it just brings up the fact its the sex that bears offspring.iow fertility.
> knowing someone is a female means nothing towards their fertility and able to make babies. you're just illiterate i get it. so again
> bear offspring or produce eggsthat means fertility for a female.
>(the only utility you can adhoc think of) 34% of the female population is above 50 and effectively are infertile.you're the one here with the ad hoc trying to justify that your wig makes you female. 34% of the pop ceased to be female because they can neither produce eggs nor bear children, aka infertile.
>if 1/3 women are infertile. does that mean knowing if someone is a women will help you know if they are fertile? no.they're not women tho. just because most people make this classification error doesn't make it so. that is akin to saying most people believe in god therefore the skydaddy is real.
