No.12032102 ViewReplyOriginalReport
So Von Neumann's 'no hidden variables' proof showed that hidden variables were impossible.

This proof was wrong. Bohm showed that hidden variables are in fact possible, as long as they non-local.

Bell provided evidence for this fact, showing that non-locality exists beyond a reasonable doubt.

My question is this. What was the problem with Von Neumann's "proof"? Was it simply that he assumed locality to be a given?