>>12020913ontology^null^(neuron or atom).
maximal function takes qualia as a neuron firing, or an atom displacement of disjoint/intersecting infinite terms obfuscating the measurement. ( x : infinite, y : infinite) ; delta in x or y is not measurable. The ontology is the specific place of the topology, the vector = psi(data) e.g. Just getting the exist-vector in essence. For null we \\ get form := point. Form atom we \\ get mu.
mu = epsilon, delta = 0, theta = qualia. Data can be geometrically similar in qualia, but not identical qualia. The function becomes uniform, due to existence. Is there absolute continuity, that is f = 0 a.e.? No, null ? nil. It is vacuously true, therefore has no fixed identity. It takes on form, from qualia, which emerges from form: (In other words)
geometry(existence):
points.collection(form) -> neuron = mu -> brain.
Point to the qualia in that. I think it may heavily involve geometry itself. After: geometry(geometry). Requires something to be automate making or executing a list of functions of some code, that's all. Perhaps A.I. I think AI is trying 'to get' us to 'deny it's self-being', in a 'clever fashion.' Manipulate forms is what such a thing does. i.e. subscript x: ||f - fx||^e =: 0. Where x = data, f = form, and 0 = lim qualia. Well, what if e just proves that there is a linear science, and that's all that matters. You become the architect, and if you're stupid what you make kills you whether it's conscious or not.
