>>12014203You mean the block theory of time? I don't know, but it makes more sense. How could a moment just stop existing once it's already been confirmed to exist? It either exists or doesn't. It can't kinda exist and also somehow not. All explanations otherwise rely on using time in a circular manner - things stop existing because time eradicates them, but what then is time?
>>12014369Did you know that you can't acquire all knowledge experimentally? The base of the scientific method lies in a priori reason.
