>>12015096>>12015111Your assumptions are wrong.
You are assuming that the laws of classical physics are the whole truth at any length scale.
This is simply WRONG.
The laws of classical physics are only accurate at macroscopic scales.
They are only the edge case that you get when you apply quantum physics to large scales.
The fundamental interaction between electrons and photons is that electrons CAN absorb/emit photons as long as some properties like energy or momentum are conserved.
If you zoom out far enough this just looks like accelerating/decelerating electrons just absorb/emit photons.
But the fundamental aspect of this is that there is an energy/momentum difference between the photon at the beginning and the end of the process.
If such a difference is not possible for some reason THERE CAN BE NO ABSORPTION OR EMISSION.
Your assumption that an electron in a hydrogen atom is constantly accelerating is also wrong.
Classical physics makes it look like there is something like a sharp particle that's like a small ball or a point.
This is WRONG.
On a fundamental level there are no particles, just fields.
Electrons are just an excitation in the electron field that does not have a 100% defined position.
They are a cloud of probability density for an interaction with another excitation in a field.
The net position of the electron does not change over time: the electron cloud stays centered around the nucleus.
Therefore there is no actual acceleration of the electron in the atom.
Admittedly I have also used the image of the classical particle in this thread for some explanations but this was simply to illustrate the abstract concept of a field in a form that can be grasped more easily.
If you don't get it with this there is no help for you.
