>>12010826Oh no, I'm answering every claim, it's you who dislikes the facts.
>In sweden, the government felt like mandatory measures are not necessary because people follow recommendations.So every other country is unable to follow recommendations (ok, maybe Belarus)? Sweden is truly the paragon of a free world then.
>It still fared worse than any country that responded early with mandatory precautions.There are countries worse than Sweden (and, as said, North Korea fared the best, so your faring worse estimates are based on the wrong criteria).
>They never recommended avoiding masks, you are ready to lie.That's wrong again, Tegnell (swedish state epidemiologist who fought against lockdowns) both advises against masks and agrees to open schools.
>The basically global lockdowns helped curb growth to almost stagnate, once countries reopened infections began rising exponentially again.So your lockdowns are supposed to be endless and eternal? Good, at least you are clear here. Also please tell me why Sweden has no "exponential" cases/deaths now?
>Countries with mandatory precautions like masks in supermarkets are faring best in controlling the spread.As said, Sweden has almost no deaths now.
>Multiple vaccines are in testing phase. Keeping infections as low as possible for as long as possible minimizes overall loss of life.Then add forced vaccinations to the list. Judging by the fact that no good coronavirus vaccines were developed yet (and, to compare, flu vaccines are shitty), it will be quite a shitshow.
