The Riemann hypothesis is false and yet the reality simulators persist in simulating the unreality in which no one knows if it's true or false. I say, "They ignore the truth," and I post a picture of the truth that I'm talking about. Then the my counterparties in the fake reality say, "Oh they ignore the truth like you ignore the 992398 errors in your paper," but they never post of a picture of an error and every time they try, thy get severely BTFOed. Even then the reality simulators simulate the false reality. For instance, this stupid problem that no one gives a shit about


turned into national news at the exact same time that I posted my solution to RH on this piece of shit website, but the reality simulators will only simulate conditions which are harmful to me, and so the unreviewed solution to RH I posted here got no public accolade even while the unreviewed solution to this other piece of shit, which is probably fake, did receive a rather large public blowjob. So, I wonder: why do they call it simulated reality when it is not realistic at all? It's like SimCity with Godzilla, tornadoes, an earthquakes, but no ability to build anything. Is that really accurately called "Sim"City? I think it is not.

Thread about simulating the Riemann hypothesis.