/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12007451

11KiB, 135x135, RationalWiki_Logo.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 12:59:28 2020 No.12007451 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12007454 >>12007457 >>12007472 >>12007481 >>12007499 >>12007529 >>12007569 >>12007639 >>12007746 >>12007766 >>12007768

> https://rationalwiki.org
Based?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 13:02:20 No.12007454 Report

Quoted By: >>12007637

>>12007451
Their political articles are garbage, but the ones about pseudosciences, religion and /x/ shit are good.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 13:03:54 No.12007457 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007451
A lot of it's vapid. The logic and decision theory stuff was interesting though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 13:09:58 No.12007472 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007451
It's written by pseuds with genuinely good intentions. Many articles betray their incompetence but it's not completely terrible.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 13:13:44 No.12007481 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007451
it clearly has no peerreview.

does it even have any aspects which are better than wikipedia?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 13:28:29 No.12007499 Report

Quoted By: >>12007527 >>12009152

>>12007451
it is based
based on communism, organized atheism, transexualism, and plebbitism

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 13:39:43 No.12007527 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007499
This. It is heavily politicized, so read is as propaganda of one of the sides.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO chad rationalist.jpg, 256KiB, 2047x788

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 13:41:03 No.12007529 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007451
RationalWIki are just leftists pretending to be scientists

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 13:57:59 No.12007559 Report

Quoted By:

it makes the vixra schizos seethe which is good enough for me, haven't read their other stuff.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 14:04:23 No.12007569 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007451
>Me smart and right you dumb and wrong. I’ll make a website as proof!
Most of the time it’s correct, but it’s written by a bunch of insufferably egotistical Redditors.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 14:44:10 No.12007637 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007454
>good articles on pseudosciences
They aren’t. It’s just mostly clueless people copying low level and popular science articles. If you want to be informed on something you have to find out the two or three leading proponents of both/more positions and read them. Otherwise don’t pretend to have a clue.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 14:46:28 No.12007639 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007451
Leftist equivilent of metapedia

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 15:56:29 No.12007746 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007451
SJW trash and the fact that you can't see that should worry you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 16:16:03 No.12007766 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007451
Some of it is funny to read.
But don't take it seriously, because it's full of errors, lies, and other bullshit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 16:18:33 No.12007768 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007451
Should be called the irrational wiki

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 17:21:02 No.12007956 Report

Quoted By:

It's "rational" in the same way that leftist value judgments are "science-based".

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 17:22:50 No.12007962 Report

Quoted By:

makes christians seethe

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Aug 2020 23:28:17 No.12009152 Report

Quoted By:

>>12007499
As far as I can see, this is statement is fairly accurate.
What an awfully biased website.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches