>>12004447dont be an idiot like this anon and believe everything you see from hollywood.
>>12004375you would deploy disjointed detector and weapon units like a minefield because they are much cheaper than shit like
>>12004390. except in this case the "mines" have an effective range in the order of millions of miles and they can communicate with each other and have unlimited redundancy
they would be small, modular and constructed in a way to minimize detection. weapons of choice would be lasers for short range and missiles for long range and indirect strikes. their movement would be randomized to protect against brainlet weapons like muuh mass drivers or rail guns. of course the missiles would be constructed in a way so you cant see them coming and even if you do you cant just zap them
