>>12005483Also, you're right. Music is polyphonic. For the sake of discussion:
Nobody else does analytically calculated technique and composition on one instrument (guitar) as far as I've read into, which for the sake of argument you should address. Dubstep and classical may have neat spiral trigonometry... but not non-linear calculus...
Polyrhythms may be calculus, and you may find a beat having different intersections per measure, but this is really simple topology and doesn't enter anything significantly analytical because it just follows a beat with a fixed riff and bpm. If you take topology out of the question, to make a riff analytical it must be repetitive and change every bar, consider the real line. Sup polyrythmic cycle is usually too simple.
Go look at the tab for 'Dancers to A Discordant System.' You have to count the measure and do arithmetic in order to do analysis. They play it in a variety of tones (albeit with a basis underlying the theory), but the riff is repetitive, polyrhythmic, and changes every bar.
You don't understand that polyphonic is not analysis. Megadeth is just basic rhythms that do not change and are fixed, without ANY prerequisites for calculus based music. You could argue, generally, that the voice has syllables and that volume of an instrument could be a calculus, and that a displacement here or there is arithmetic, real, and displacement, but I would argue that this is just narrative and is not a niche of calculus because that would conflate the type of effect that it actually is.
There is nothing wrong with Megadeth. They are a great band. I like them. They're good on the radio. They're good metal, no ones arguing that.
I don't like discussing genre, because anything fits, but Meshuggah is metal historically as a Swedish extreme metal band completely attached and related to the scene and influences. And also tonally with lots of distortion, metal riffs and grooves, polytonic breakdowns etc.