>>11993300>This is a research that might suggest so essentially, but it's still more of an empirical theory if you read it carefullyDisagreeing here. It is the careful phrasing typical of scientific literature that you are pointing out. It is not the smoking gun that you seem to think it is.
>What proof do you need yet in 2020?Citations to peer-reviewed studies in established scientific journals would form a nice start.
>For example, how many homosexuals have declared to have been abused or raped as a child, how many people become bisexual or trans very later in their life?I have no idea on your first question. Your second question is going to depend on how you want to define "become bisexual or trans": is it about the first realization something feels off, the full awareness, the vaguely-related fantasies and daydreaming or maybe the coming out and social transition?
>I even know personally one of these people who have declared thisThat is entirely anecdotal. Also, it is impossible for me to figure out what kind of declaration you are meaning here.
>Sexuality is not just something that is predetermined and fixedThe scientific literature conflicts with this statement. Afaik pretty much all studies indicate rigidity of sexual orientation and gender identity.
>it can be drastically shaped by alterity and experential circumstancesIt is hard to determine what you are attempting to convey here, but in case it is about experience shaping sexual orientation or gender identity to great degree, there is zero evidence for this. Link me a paper if you have reason to think otherwise.
>>11993194>Non-communicative SDN in the hypothalamus triggered and enhanced by societal circumstancesInteresting explanation. Can you reference a study?
