>>11992446Thanks for being an example of what I was talking about in the OP. Anyways, your dogmatism is your undoing in this thread like I said... what is evident is that I did say something and I didn't have "nothing to say" and you tried to assume my intelligence based on very little information and then you tried to rank yourself above me for some reason, and I didn't rank myself above you but I simply found a problem with you pretending to be smarter than me. And of course that offended you somehow and you decided to be a douche about it.
>>11992469 despite the fact that you have done nothing in this thread but give me your time and attempt to sage the thread erroneously so because I was just bumping it every time I replied to you, so it was as if every time you made a post the thread would bump anyways, but you couldn't pick up on that until I told you, so that's when you decided to stop responding to me. You really showed me anon, and most-importantly is that this thread wasn't pointless and you aren't necessarily right just because you thought it was, you don't determine everything yourself. Not very scientific of you, anon.
