>>11983637Sorry about that, but take this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr6nNvw55C4A lot of "don't know" and "speculation" and theories and this guy knows his shit, more than me for sure. He knows the math, the physics supporting those theories and everything else needed, he has access to labs and researches, but at some point...he becomes vague, because he doesn't know, we don't know. Now , what do we know? We exist while we shouldn't. It's easier to think everything always existed, so it's not about the Big Bang at all.If everything always existed time doesn't matter there, so we just exist to "prove" our existence. Our perception of time is just an "illusion", everything already happened. The alternative would be a problem, infinite and timeless doesn't go well with 'in progress'. About our existence it could be no different than a videogame character trying to understand where he comes from, he understands he is in a game, because the game allows him to be aware, but how far can he go from there? How can he understand the formatting before the OS was installed, then the OS itself existing before his existence, let's say he understands he exists after the installation...he would be somewhere our point now. However...what if I that "PC" simulates the complete game of the character, from start to finish in, let's say, a millisecond, the character could perceive years, but it all lasted a millisecond. It's probably what's going on here. Everything happened forever, so at some point, we must be in it, otherwise it would lack something.
