/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11983255

100KiB, 1126x602, fraud.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Statistics Confidence Intervals

Anonymous Fri 07 Aug 09:44:25 2020 No.11983255 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11983290 >>11985949

lol are we just adding fake shit into our data now just because 'it behaves nicer'? What the actual fuck????

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Aug 2020 09:59:17 No.11983290 Report

Quoted By: >>11983298

>>11983255
based smoothiebrain

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ngmi-habibi.png, 2MiB, 1439x1436

Anonymous Fri 07 Aug 2020 10:03:59 No.11983298 Report

Quoted By:

>>11983290
>defending a-crusty-coffee intervals
you sicken me

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Aug 2020 21:01:28 No.11984880 Report

Quoted By:

probably, this can be justified using first-principle arguments. take a look at (section 3): https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0701199v1.pdf

the mean obtained from the distribution that they construct, based on a binomial one, follows that exact same rule

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 08 Aug 2020 05:28:34 No.11985949 Report

Quoted By:

>>11983255
>can't comprehend basic shit like convergence and biased estimators
>oh, I know, I'll just call it fake shit

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches