>>11979235Nothing prevents each individual output from being the same.
For example, if we don't have infinite time, but instead we only have enough time for the monkey to press one key on the typewriter, the probability he will type "F" is not zero, but so is the probability he will type "A."
Why do we presume one of these options will eventually happen and not the other one?
In reality, both are possible.
So it is also possible that with infinite time he'd only type F it is just less likely because we are repeating the same experiment eternally but there is no rule saying he can't type F every single time forever. It is just repeating the same experiment over and over. The results don't necessarily have to change but they would tend to because there are more possibilities with more repetitions.
Each keystroke increases the odds of having a variety in the word typed.
Typing AAAA is equally likely to AFAF
but AAAA is not as likely as typing anything besides AAAA, that is why it becomes less likely over time too.
He could type AAAF or AFFF or whatever... so there are more options and therefore it is more likely complex words could form with more time but not necessary or proven, in fact, it is proven logically that he can type AAAA forever.
