1. Real at all or a total hoax?
2. Even if somewhat real, is the seriousness/severity of it being exaggerated by governments for nefarious purposes? If so, what are those purposes? The numbers aren't even that bad and they cooked so the real numbers are a fraction and it seems most people who die are old people on their last legs anyway, so the enormity of shutting down the economy and society just seems way out of proportion.
3. Even if real and even if severe, is shutdown really a sensible thing to do? Seems pointless to me, so much damage, and look as soon as things start to open up again the cases start going up. Seems to me the only way would be to literally lock everyone in the world down completely, no one leaves their room for like 3 years, maybe then the virus will have disappeared and we can all emerge safely. But of course that is impossible. With the type of lockdown we had, it only seems to kick the can down the road. You can't eradicate completely without locking up everyone in the world for such a long time, so when we start to reemerge of course it's gonna start spreading again, it was always going to spread. We have to go through it at some point, we are basically where we were in March...except 4 months later and having destroyed the economy in the meantime, making society even weaker against it. Lockdown, hiding from it, was pointless, seems to me we should have just let it naturally spread as quickly as possible. Some oldies and obese people die, whatever. Instead we've made a completely dogs mess of it now. It's such a fuckup it's hard to believe that it was down to incompetence, they had to have done this on purpose...
I am a /pol/tard but can't rely on /pol/ now, so much disinfo and trolls. Too much noise, /pol/ is basically that prediction from MGS2, so much info that it's impossible to find a truth/meaning needle in the giant haystack of noise. Libtards have their own agenda, Trumptards have their own agenda. No one there is trustworthy.
2. Even if somewhat real, is the seriousness/severity of it being exaggerated by governments for nefarious purposes? If so, what are those purposes? The numbers aren't even that bad and they cooked so the real numbers are a fraction and it seems most people who die are old people on their last legs anyway, so the enormity of shutting down the economy and society just seems way out of proportion.
3. Even if real and even if severe, is shutdown really a sensible thing to do? Seems pointless to me, so much damage, and look as soon as things start to open up again the cases start going up. Seems to me the only way would be to literally lock everyone in the world down completely, no one leaves their room for like 3 years, maybe then the virus will have disappeared and we can all emerge safely. But of course that is impossible. With the type of lockdown we had, it only seems to kick the can down the road. You can't eradicate completely without locking up everyone in the world for such a long time, so when we start to reemerge of course it's gonna start spreading again, it was always going to spread. We have to go through it at some point, we are basically where we were in March...except 4 months later and having destroyed the economy in the meantime, making society even weaker against it. Lockdown, hiding from it, was pointless, seems to me we should have just let it naturally spread as quickly as possible. Some oldies and obese people die, whatever. Instead we've made a completely dogs mess of it now. It's such a fuckup it's hard to believe that it was down to incompetence, they had to have done this on purpose...
I am a /pol/tard but can't rely on /pol/ now, so much disinfo and trolls. Too much noise, /pol/ is basically that prediction from MGS2, so much info that it's impossible to find a truth/meaning needle in the giant haystack of noise. Libtards have their own agenda, Trumptards have their own agenda. No one there is trustworthy.
