>>11973615>you could talk about anything other than the typo thenI only posted
>>11973434 and
>>11973580 both of these replies instructed you to pay no attention to the typo as it was not the subject of my concern.
>Why do you think I'm low iq?I was just taking the piss, can't you even understand that?
>Why do you think I am not smart?>needs to boast about how smart they really are, even though that's not helping the thread anyway>only in stem to prove himself>can't think for himself, must be spoonfed>thinks graduating stem without studying is proof of being le real smart>thinks that cleverness limits subjects you should pursue>can't fathom that others could be naturally good at specific things too but still might want to study to improve on both preferred and challenging subjects>textbook case of the Dunning-Kruger effect>thinks smartness is the only important quality in an academic life>can't perceive other people reasoning and motivations, must simplify: "people will reject what I am about to say because bullshit"Also, you lack both in reading comprehension and attention to obvious errors (error which was pointed out to help you, here).
These two qualities are needed to understand questions during exams...
How can you be good at school if you can't even read?
I hope you didn't lie anon...
I hope you really are smart enough to indulge in your self-congratulation and your indolent ways.
But smartness can only take us so far...
Creativity, concentration, dedication and open-mindedness are important and valid qualities that I think you should train.
You would greatly benefit from them.
In the end, just remember that I meant no disrespect, I suspect that many among us used to be like you.
And even though the tone of my remarks was kind of mocking, none of this was thought in a condescending way.
I don't think more highly of myself and wish you would improve just as I and others are trying to.
You don't need to answer, I hope you'll try and improve.
