Last thread >>11959598
/Sci/entists failed to debunk the Turkey UFO video.
Original footage
>2007
https://youtu.be/27Ip7vqqJBE [Embed]
>2008
Part 1, Part 2, Part 3
https://youtu.be/imwqRPr83is [Embed]
https://youtu.be/zVdeM99mkMs [Embed]
https://youtu.be/tysuz2OTO3k [Embed]
>2009
https://youtu.be/BX3VTg1uQrw [Embed]
Conclusion from investigation
>"The objects observed on the images have a structure made of a specific material and are definitely not any kind of CGI animation or in any means a type of special effects used for simulation in a studio or for video effects. So the conclusion of this report is that the observations are not a model, marquette, or a fraud" and the last part of the report, "it's concluded that the objects observed have a physical structure and are made of materials that don't belong to any category of (airplanes, helicopters, meteors, Venus, Mars, satellites, artificial lights, Chinese lanterns, etc.) and that it mostly fits in the category of UFO's (Unidentified Flying Objects and of unknown origin)".
>Other analysis was done by video specialist, image edition and special effect companies from Japan, Russia, and Turkey, all ending up with the same conclusions. In Chile, I asked professor José Atenas to technically examine the videos, an expert in graphics and video with more than 30 years of experience on television. In his appreciation, José Atenas also came to the same conclusions that the images are authentic.
Overview of the entire case
http://turkeyufocase.blogspot.com/
Close up analysis and speculation of footage
http://archivosovni2.blogspot.com/2012/04/graphic-analysis-on-videos-regarding.html?m=1