>>11964379If this were true, it would select for small penis dudes since the females themselves are the sexual selectors. Despite the unpleasant idea of one's daugher being dicked (much as the unpleasant notion of one's parents dicking triggers the Westermarck Effect), when viewed objectively, if a father cares about his individual evolutionary legacy (despite himself dying, of course), then he ought to want lots of daughters. More daughters means more progeny, and probably better progeny at that due to the asymmetric selector role of the woman.
On the hedonic side, societies would do well to select for an abundance of females if they use depraved and coercive methods such as sex-based abortion, as is common in Asia, especially India and China. The irony is that in these cultures exactly the wrong tack is taken: for cultural reasons and for certain intrinsic utilitarian reasons (the physical strength of the male), the male is preferred over the female. In the long term however, this leads to a glut of leftover incel rice-penis men, where no such glut ever need have occurred. Further, the frustrated man is far more likely to pose a serious social risk, whereas the frustrated woman will just deal or otherwise herself more peacefully. The rational act of society as a whole is to instead produce a glut of women, forcing them to accept of threesomes and lowering their standards to betas, to the net benefit and general concord of the species.
