>>11962798No, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Godel simply says there are statements that don't follow from the axioms and can be assumed to be either true or false without leading to a contradiction for a theory that contains Peano arithmetic. Do the axioms of physics contain PA? I doubt it. Any undecidable question could always be answered experimentally and added as a new axiom. Even if there are undecidable questions in physics, there's nothing to say the MAJOR results can't all be decidable, which is what has happened in maths so far. Also, undecidable questions always involve infinity somewhere, because if there are only a finite number of possibilities you can always just run through them all to answer the question, making such statements fundamentally unphysical, requiring an infinite number of experiments to be performed. Such results can be ignored -- all physics needs to do is predict the results of experiments we can actually do.
