>>11951612>definitely someone who isn't known "because they're a woman."Do you really believe that? I'm not sure. I do think her work is worthy of more attention, however, I think fame and recognition for scientific/mathematical achievements is often more about promotion than anything else.
See:Newton spiting Leibniz. I think there are countless examples of Men and Women who made contributions who are relatively unknown. Is Tycho Brahe being less known than Kepler a conspiracy, or just a historical circumstance?