>>11953481If we are a simulation, my bet would be that we're unsupervised. The ability to simulate also doesn't necessarily imply the ability to have perfect knowledge of the simulation. I have no doubt that even if the simulators were actively observing the sim, and not just taking aggregate extracts or waiting to see if it converges or something, that they still wouldn't care about us. In the grand scheme of the simulation, we're just fungus on a rock.
>>11953496It's a much more general and "rigorous" interpretation of God, but no belief is involved. It's mere acceptance of the possibility, and curiosity around the idea of proving or disproving it.
