Gödel’s Ontological Argument
No.11949408 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>11949436 >>11949451 >>11949671
Gödel has shown that Godlikeness is the prime essence of any Godlike object or ‘’property’’ which is never itself objectify in interchangeability of primitive names. Any conceivable Godlike object is immaterial, thus impossible to represent even in formal proofs, being tributary of mathematical ‘’objects’’ necessary truth. A Godlike object being all positive possibilities and necessary conditions of every possible reality once created by existing elements of every positive realities or essences of our own possible world. The issue of God’s existence rather than his uniqueness to ours is proven by properties quantification. But God hides greater causes. Because, God’s uniqueness is not unconceived but postulated universal essences existing for all beings, being collapsed for contingent modalities.
For if God was postulated without creation there would be no consequential necessity, for every being, but only universal essences of all omnipresent possible worlds. Therefore, God is a being because all essences, singular in nature, are names of entities by Godlikeness properties.
And Light became flesh thereupon God’s Will.
For if God was postulated without creation there would be no consequential necessity, for every being, but only universal essences of all omnipresent possible worlds. Therefore, God is a being because all essences, singular in nature, are names of entities by Godlikeness properties.
And Light became flesh thereupon God’s Will.
