>>11948547>Low iq posts>Point is every number after .9 will be smaller than .9 and .9 < 1you really shitting on people for low iq and then drop that shit?
>>11948552so if you take the set of all numbers less than 1, (-inf, 1), this is called an open set, and it does not contain 1
however, if we take the CLOSURE of this set, we get (-inf, 1] now including 1
This is because the closure contains all the limit points of the original set, so this means 1 is a limit of all the numbers less than it.
we could do the same thing with (0,1)
there is a limit to 0 within this set, we can just take the numbers 1/2 and then 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, ...
all these numbers are positive but they limit to 0, something nonpositive.
A limit point has a proper definition that i wont get into
>>11948568>but if it doesn't deconstruct to unity before infinite it is not an equality it is an identityyoure just making shit up, go fuck off
