>>11947595You know those arguments go both ways, right?
1. No it isn't / CO2 isn't the reason / humans aren't the reason / there is no earth. Take your pick.
2. Seen too many at that end as well. Worst one was wikipedia, where editors were desperate to show historic data shows CO2 affected temp millions of years ago, and not the other way around.
3. Why? It is a known fact water is responsible for 90+% (off memory, I believe it's 98%+) of greenhouse effect on earth. Any source claiming otherwise is lying, or states they left water and a few other molecules out in small print.
Old generation knows this, that is individuals that came in with physics backgrounds.
New generation are clueless mostly, and treat the field akin to psychology, or political science, which is why most results that come out are garbage.
