>>11946577>The universe is a 4D yes
>4D sphere spheres are 3 dimensional. Spheres are literally defined as having 3 spatial dimensions
>I know this because an edge of the universe is inconcievableno. just because you cant imagine the edge of the observable universe doesn't mean that it doesn't exist
>Infinity also does not existall math points to you being wrong
>You you start in one direction and go forever you end up back at the same place eventuallyno
>The Universe always existed depending on how the universe "began", possibly true, but unknown at this time
>but that's not infinity because time is just an illusionwrong. time is a dimension, same as length, width, and height. we only have the ability to observe it, not modify it like we do the spatial dimensions. only dimwits believe time is an "illusion" (which means absolutely nothing. this is not a profound statement. its gibberish said by vain idiots to sound profound)
>It may eternally recurif it can eternally recur, then it would be infinite.
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/eternal>If the 4D is expanding it will eventually collapse and everything will happen againthe objects in the universe are speeding faster and faster away from each other.
>>11948049wrong. the observable universe is spherical, not flat. This is also assuming the observable universe is the entire universe, something no one is sure about yet (if its even possible for us to know)
>>11950319>Since the Big Bang is proven nowits the general consensus, but by no means proven. there are still many flaws with the big bang model, but its the one that has the most proof.
TL;DR OP is a faggot, who needs to at least read the wikipedia article on the shape of the universe before pretending to be intelligent
