>>11946929I'm an INTJ and all I can say is that it's hard to establish whether a new thought or behavior is "better" or "worse" unless you've established a strict routine you can compare it to. Otherwise you're dealing with chaos, scattered data, and relying on your own inaccurate judgement.
I'll use my fitness routine as an example: I'm pretty strict about it. I have the same things I do (and have done for almost a decade now) and rarely change or tweak anything about it. That lets me get an idea of whether anything I change about it is actually better or worse. Same thing with my diet, I get around the same macros every week with the same cycle of meals, so if I introduce something new (or get rid of something) I can tell if it's had a positive or negative impact.
When someone tries to push something new on me I will stubbornly insist they demonstrate its worth so I'm not subject to the kind of chaotic, wasteful lifestyles and mindsets people seem to deal with in the US at least. That goes for products or ideas. I guess the main idea is that constantly questioning leads to chaotic life data to draw from, our brains are already really hard to sort out as is.
