>>11947913>spacetime does exist As a model, yes. As something that does something? No.
>at least try to understand general relativity before you post hereI do, which is why I referred to spacetime as a "model". Retard.
Time-a measurement. Does not actually exist as something, it's a standard of measure imagined by humans based on real physical interactions that actually exist
Space- A privation. Defined by everything that it is not. Has no properties.
>combined into one term"Spacetime" was combined and used to define "spacetime:the model". There is no actual place or real thing known as "Spacetime" that you can actually show me without defining it using another measurement or arbitrary placeholder that doesn't exist.
>but that's wrongokay, so test either in an experiment and see what properties they have.
>they can be bentWhich would be a description, but doesn't allude to what they are or how they do that nor how they even exist in the first place.
