>>11938725Survey of opinions on the primacy of g and social consequences of ability testing: A comparison of expert and non-expert views
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.03.007Didn't post it to prove the validity of IQ, since expert opinion alone doesn't make something true, but another thing these "IQ is pseudosciene" people say is that the experts have rejected IQ, which is simply not true.
