"To create from inert matter a living organism--that is, a thing that could replicate itself, metabolize food, etc.--would require a technology beyond imagination. The ultimate problem is that we couldn't possibly put together, in a coherent life-producing sequence, the submicroscopic DNA acid molecules and the surrounding proteins."---Joel Achenback, "Why Scientists Can't Create Life," Knight-Ridder, February 26, 1989.
"All the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin."—Dr. Lyall Watson, Science Speaks, Volume 90, May 1982, p.44.
"The more statistically improbable a thing is, the less we can believe that it just happened by blind chance. Superficially the obvious alternative to chance is an intelligent Designer." —R. Dawkins, "The Necessity of Darwinism". New Scientist, Vol. 94, April 15, 1982, p. 130.
"Darwinian myth is the greatest deceit in the history of science."—Dr. Soren Lovtrup, Swedish evolutionist
"The problem, some suggest, is that more than a century after paleontologists started unearthing the bones of all sorts of ancient creatures, we don't have enough fossils to say anything authoritatively about prehistoric life. "I'd say the fossil record is woefully deficient in preserving the absolute diversity of species," says Mark Norell, head of the Division of Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History in New York.—"Fossils Unearth Big Debate" USA Today, Nov. 6, 2006.
"All the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin."—Dr. Lyall Watson, Science Speaks, Volume 90, May 1982, p.44.
"The more statistically improbable a thing is, the less we can believe that it just happened by blind chance. Superficially the obvious alternative to chance is an intelligent Designer." —R. Dawkins, "The Necessity of Darwinism". New Scientist, Vol. 94, April 15, 1982, p. 130.
"Darwinian myth is the greatest deceit in the history of science."—Dr. Soren Lovtrup, Swedish evolutionist
"The problem, some suggest, is that more than a century after paleontologists started unearthing the bones of all sorts of ancient creatures, we don't have enough fossils to say anything authoritatively about prehistoric life. "I'd say the fossil record is woefully deficient in preserving the absolute diversity of species," says Mark Norell, head of the Division of Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History in New York.—"Fossils Unearth Big Debate" USA Today, Nov. 6, 2006.
