/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11930555

60KiB, 894x677, DniuLaMW0AAcW4p.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Quantized inertia

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 16:08:46 2020 No.11930555 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11930558

Is quantized inertia a crackpot theory or a breakthrough? It claims to get rid of dark matter and without adjustable parameters.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantized_inertia

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:09:36 No.11930558 Report

Quoted By: >>11930561

>>11930555
>Is quantized inertia a crackpot theory
yes

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:10:24 No.11930561 Report

Quoted By: >>11930564

>>11930558
Why?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:13:04 No.11930564 Report

Quoted By: >>11930567

>>11930561
> The theory of quantized inertia has been criticized in articles online as being pseudoscience.[2][33][3] Some of the problems it was initially proposed to solve have since been solved by conventional physics, in particular the Pioneer Anomaly is explained by thermal recoil from the spacecraft's power source. Furthermore experiments to measure the thrust of resonant cavity thrusters have recorded values much lower than originally predicted that are likely explained by interactions with the Earth's magnetic field.[34]

>In 2019, a Romanian particle physicist performed a derivation of quantized inertia in which he claims to have found two errors in McCulloch's original work prior to 2013. He subsequently provides a new derivation showing different predictions.[35]

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:15:12 No.11930567 Report

Quoted By: >>11930578 >>11930615

>>11930564
None of that directly concerns the dark matter predictions. Is there any reason in principle why an asymmetric Unruh radiation cannot give rise to a force when an object accelerates?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:22:14 No.11930578 Report

Quoted By: >>11930609

>>11930567
Dark matter is real anon. We know there is something there it has gravity and it’s not baryonic matter. Get with the 21st century.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:35:00 No.11930609 Report

Quoted By: >>11930637

>>11930578
So those MOND people are just bullshitting around then

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:36:35 No.11930615 Report

Quoted By: >>11930617

>>11930567
Well a good reason would be the fact that Unruh radiation doesn't exist.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:38:29 No.11930617 Report

Quoted By: >>11930631

>>11930615
If Unruh radiation doesn't exist then so doesn't Hawking radiation. Do you contest that one too?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:43:06 No.11930631 Report

Quoted By: >>11930638

>>11930617
Erm, say what now?! There is no correlation between those two phenomena. One does not imply the other.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:45:07 No.11930637 Report

Quoted By:

>>11930609
Yes. Every recent observations only seem to disagree with all MOND theories even more whilst also increasing the likelihood DM is a particle.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jul 2020 16:45:58 No.11930638 Report

Quoted By:

>>11930631
Isn't Unruh radiation generated at the Rindler horizon?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches