>>11929771Oh look it's that shitty denier meme.
>Human contribution of CO2 into the atmosphere>Ignores that natural sinks absorb more CO2 than natural sources emit, while humans don't.>CO2 lags temperature by 800-2000 yearsOf course it does, if orbital eccentricity causes insolation to increase, then warming starts the feedback loop between warming and CO2 evaporating from the oceans. The climate has never had humans dump massive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere, thus we have never seen CO2 start to increase before temperature, until now! Do you think climatologists don't already know this? Do you not realize that without this feedback loop you cannot explain the Milankovich cycle? No of course not, you have no idea what your idiotic memes are even implying.
>The models are wrongActually the data is wrong. Several sources of error were discovered in the satellite techniques since 2009 and they are now much more in line with the instrumental data. To see how well the IPCC is doing I suggest you look at current updates:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/climate-model-projections-compared-to-observations/>Ice core samples indicate warm periods long before the Industrial RevolutionLocal samples, not indicative of a global average temperature.
And last but not least another fraudulent graph, using flawed, cherrypicked data and not even showing surface temperature.
