>>11930242When humans assign a bit of information to some physical state, all we are doing is agreeing on a set of representations and using that to pass information back and forth. It does not exist as a thing in itself.
We can take a coin on a table and claim that "heads up" is equal to an on bit and "tails up" is equal to a zero bit, and then we can define a logic on that system so that we can use it to pass information between ourselves. That's "computation". But it does not, at all, exist as a thing in itself. What actually exists is the physical state of the system as an evolution of the wavefunction of the particles that consistence the material that we are using to "compute" something. The actual computation is a human abstraction corresponding to phenomenological experiences in our mind. It does not exist at all.
We can do the same thing to any other system, sliding the wooden piece on an abacus to the left or right is a "bit" of information, or turning an electrical transistor on or off, etc. All of these can be used to represent two states of an idea that humans pre defined.
NONE of them are actually real things in themselves, and none of them are in any way related to each other in terms of their physical existence. The "computation" is a human construct, just like language or math.
You don't understand this because you are not intelligent at all.