How many people would you need to survive an apocalypse without crippling everyone into extinction?
Considering that better genes (that doesn't carry potential defects) will result in a better outcome, would it be ethical to pick extraordinarily healthy people in order to survive at a population minimum when colonizing other planets?
Considering that better genes (that doesn't carry potential defects) will result in a better outcome, would it be ethical to pick extraordinarily healthy people in order to survive at a population minimum when colonizing other planets?
