>>11927145>So there is no moral foundation to any laws?No, only propaganda to appease the cattle, the State is a human farm basically
>Why is murder illegal?Because its not convinient for the State to spend the money they steal from the population on the externalities of people killing themselves all the time, not to mention if people can kill each other that means less "tax contributors" and could even (of course not they would make an exception) make some politicians, judges, State members in general, die
>Your assertion that might makes right (in itself a form of Nietzschean morality, but let's sidestep that) would support the idea of a police state.You live in a police state, no matter where you live, why do you think there have happened shit like wacco siege, ruby rigde? Guerra de Canudos in brazil for example? The State doesnt give a shit about your life the moment you start not wanting to pay taxes, and worse than that it will actively try to kill you
This idea of might makes right doesnt support anything, it just describes reality as it is, if christians got all the power in the world and started killing muslims and jews that would be an example of the principle working but it doesnt mean its right (well, it would be for the society in hand because they have the power)
>>11927141>f I go outside right now and start blasting everyone I see what happens? The State sends people to kill me.Unless of course youre from the FBI, ATF, MOSSAD, etc.
What is objectively right and should be the principle of society is libertarian ethics, theyre good because they make society able to exist without imposing an utopia on anyone, if its being applied today or not doesnt matter for the validity of it being correct (because its logically deduced from self evident axioms), though for some reason reality seems to work with this principle too (austrian economics)
